|
|
||||||||
1 M.P. Chumakov Institute of Poliomyelitis & Viral Encephalitides, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow 142782, Russia
2 M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119899, Russia
Reprint requests to: Vadim I. Agol, M.P. Chumakov Institute of Poliomyelitis & Viral Encephalitides, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow 142782, Russia; e-mail: agol{at}belozersky.msu.ru.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Keywords: Evolution; poliovirus; RNA ligation; RNA recombination
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Assembly of RNA molecules from noncontiguous or completely separated parts is a fundamental property of many, if not all, RNA viruses as well. It underlies such diverse processes as recombination (Lai 1992
; Nagy and Simon 1997
; Worobey and Holmes 1999
), discontinuous transcription in nidoviruses, for example, coronaviruses (Lai and Holmes 2001
), and acquisition of capped 5'-segments of host mRNA by transcripts of several families of viruses with negative-strand RNA genomes, for example, influenza virus (Lamb and Krug 2001
). All of these processes, distinctive from the rearrangements of cellular RNAs, are believed to occur during the viral RNA polymerase-dependent RNA synthesis. Another distinction of viral RNA rearrangements, at least as far as RNA recombination in many viruses is concerned, is much more relaxed structural requirements.
Recently, it has been shown that biologically active molecules can also be produced by relatively site-unspecific nonhomologous nonreplicative RNA recombination. In one study (Chetverin et al. 1997
), overlapping 5'- and 3'-fragments were prepared from the small RNA species that, when intact, were replicable by the Qß phage replicase. In a cell-free system containing Qß replicase and rNTPs, these fragments were converted into species replicable by the phage enzyme as a result of nonhomologous recombination, which was dependent on the presence of the 3'-OH group on the 5'-fragment. Those authors suggested that the recombination was accomplished by a splicing-like reaction guided by a secondary structure. Nonhomologous nonreplicative RNA recombination was also reported to occur in poliovirus (Gmyl et al. 1999
). Again, overlapping pairs of fragments of viral RNA were used, one of which represented a nearly full-length 5'-untranslated region (5UTR) of the viral genome with all its replicative and translational cis-acting elements intact but lacking the polyprotein-coding frame and 3UTR. The missing RNA parts were present in the other fragment, which however carried 5UTR mutations and deletions inactivating its replicative and/or translational template activities. Upon cotransfection, these fragments generated infectious progeny containing nonhomologous recombinant genomes with the 5UTR markedly modified with respect to both the length and sequence. In a subset of these recombinants, the entire 5'-fragment was incorporated into the genome, provided this fragment had the 3'-teminal phosphate group.
The above findings raised the possibility that RNA molecules are intrinsically able to covalently interact with each other in a much less restricted manner than is currently accepted. Obviously, if this notion is correct, it would have profound biological implications. However, one could argue that more rigorous evidence is needed to accept this unorthodox view. Indeed, the splicing-like nonhomologous recombination described by Chetverin et al. (1997)
appeared to require the presence of Qß replicase, although the enzyme-independent but much less efficient recombination could also be observed (Chetverina et al. 1999
). In the case of poliovirus recombination studied by Gmyl et al. (1999)
, there was a possibility, though seemingly unlikely, that a very low level of translation of apparently untranslatable 3'-fragments of the viral RNA could have occurred and that the trace amounts of the viral RNA polymerase thus formed could have generated the recombinants by the canonical replicative template switch mode.
The goal of the present study was to unequivocally ascertain whether joining of fragments of poliovirus RNA could indeed occur without participation of the viral RNA polymerase and, if so, to define relevant requirements. To this end, we prepared new pairs of fragments of the viral genome, this time with interruptions within the sequence encoding protein 3Dpol, the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Therefore, joining of the fragments was an absolute prerequisite for the appearance of this enzyme. The validity of such an experimental design fully depended on the feasibility of previously unreported precise (homologous) nonreplicative crossovers at arbitrarily selected sites. Clearly, the precision was needed to preserve the polymerase reading frame. The experiments reported here proved that precise nonreplicative recombination does occur. Moreover, the results suggest that, unexpectedly, RNA molecules are able to covalently join each other in several apparently promiscuous ways.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The Hrp1 pair (Fig. 1
) was engineered to mimic hypothetical hairpin-like intermediates postulated to be involved in the imprecise recombination within the poliovirus 5UTR (Gmyl et al. 1999
). The Hrp1 fragments had the potential to form a heteroduplex, in which the to-be-joined nucleotides would lie in close proximity to one another within a helical element. This was achieved by introducing, into both partners, silent mutations, serving also as genetic markers. In the context of the whole genome, these mutations did not impair the virus viability (data not shown). The Hrp1 pair of 5'-partner and O 3'-partner generated, upon cotransfection, viable progeny in the range of 100200 plaque-forming units (p.f.u.) per sample containing 1 µg of each partner (Table 1
). The rescued genomes were represented by precise recombinants having no mutations in the crossover region but retaining all of the genetic markers of each fragment (Fig. 2
). This was true of the RNA prepared from plaques or isolated from purified virus after two passages on RD cells (data not shown).
|
|
The Sup pair (Fig. 1
) lacked a phosphodiester bond some 150 nt downstream of the nick in Hrp1 and had even less stringent (compared to Hrp2) constraints with regards to the mutual orientation of the terminal nucleotides. The fragments had no potential to form stable heteroduplexes in the vicinity of the ligation sites. Despite this, efficient ligation did occur (Table 1
). Again, the expected markers were in place in the sequenced recombinants (Fig. 2
). The use of NP 5'-partner or 3'-partner resulted in a dramatically lower, if any, yield of viable recombinants (Fig. 3A
; Table 1
). Combinations other than P and O failed to be efficiently ligated in the case of the Hrp1 or Hrp2 pair of partners as well (data not shown). Not only triphosphorylated (3P) but also diphosphorylated (2P) and monophosphorylated (P) forms of the 5'-terminal nucleotide of the 3'-partner also failed to efficiently generate recombinants upon cotransfection with the P form of the 5'-partners (Fig. 3C
).
|
Recombination between overlapping fragments
In the above cases, the end-to-end ligation of RNA fragments was studied. The existence of pieces of a viral genome precisely supplementing each other under natural conditions, though possible, seems relatively unlikely. To better approach natural conditions and in fact to study true recombination rather than ligation, we investigated a fourth pair of partners, Ov1, composed of the Sup 5'-partner and the Hrp2 3'-partner with six additional silent mutations (Fig. 1
). The 3'- and 5'-terminal sequences of the two partners overlapped each other by 177178 nt in the case of P and NP 5'-partners, respectively (because the P partner was one nucleotide shorter due to ß-elimination of the 3'-terminal nucleotide of the NP partner). Because in designing these partners no special attempt was made to facilitate heteroduplex formation or introduce other structural constraints, the partners could be regarded as a randomly cleaved viral genome. Nevertheless, the Ov1 partners reproducibly generated viable progeny (Table 2
).
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is known that some host DNA-dependent RNA polymerases are capable of template switching (Nudler et al. 1996
; Izban et al. 1998
; Kandel and Nudler 2002
) and of copying certain RNA molecules possessing recognizable promoter-like elements, for example viroids (Diener 2001
) or hepatitis delta virus (Modahl et al. 2000
). Also, cellular RNA-dependent RNA polymerases implicated in gene silencing (Nishikura 2001
) appear to be present in different organisms, and the tomato enzyme was characterized in some detail (Schiebel et al. 1993
, 1998
). The plant RNA-dependent RNA polymerases were shown to be able to copy single-stranded RNA templates but generated heterogeneous and relatively short products (Ikegami and Fraenkel-Conrat 1979
; Schiebel et al. 1993
). Even more importantly, no homologs of these enzymes have been found in mammalian cells. In sum, none of the cellular RNA polymerases, either DNA- or RNA-dependent, have ever been demonstrated to replicate long linear viral RNA species, such as the poliovirus genome. Again, the observed impact of terminal structure modification on the incorporation of RNA fragments into a recombinant molecule is hardly compatible with the involvement of an RNA polymerase in this process. All these considerations leave a nonreplicative mechanism as the only feasible explanation for the phenomena described here.
Replicative and nonreplicative recombination in RNA viruses
RNA recombination, first discovered in poliovirus (Ledinko 1963
; reviewed in Agol 1997
), is now described in many virus groups (Lai 1992
; Nagy and Simon 1997
; Worobey and Holmes 1999
). Recombination is generally believed to occur by a replicative template switch (copy-choice) mode, whereby an RNA molecule initiated by the viral RNA polymerase on one viral RNA template is finished by copying another viral RNA template (Cooper 1977
; Kirkegaard and Baltimore 1986
; Romanova et al. 1986
; Arnold and Cameron 1999
; Nagy et al. 1999
; Dzianott et al. 2001
; Kim and Kao 2001
). Similar mechanisms are thought to underlie other covalent viral RNA rearrangements, such as deletions and insertions (duplications). Various models for these replicative recombination/rearrangements have been proposed (Kuge et al. 1986
; Romanova et al. 1986
; Jarvis and Kirkegaard 1991
; Pilipenko et al. 1995
; Nagy and Simon 1997
), but the exact mechanisms are yet to be elucidated.
The present and previous (Gmyl et al. 1999
) studies unambiguously demonstrate the existence of an additional, nonreplicative mechanism(s) able to generate both imprecise and precise viable recombinants of an RNA virus. One may argue that the observed recombination takes place in the cells that receive a very large number of viral RNA fragments. This number however appears to be comparable to that synthesized during poliovirus infection, that is, on the order of 105 viral genomes per cell. Our results raise questions about the nature of the mechanisms, replicative or nonreplicative, responsible for various known recombination events. It was argued that homologous RNA recombination should perhaps more likely be accomplished by the template switch mode, because it was not easy to envision a nonreplicative mechanism ensuring precision of the crossovers (Chetverin 1999
). Although the putative mechanism remains elusive indeed (see below), the results presented here demonstrate that precise (homologous) nonreplicative recombination can occur and, at least under certain conditions, can occur quite efficiently. It should be admitted however that the quantitative contribution of the nonreplicative rearrangements to the natural and laboratory evolution of viral RNAs is yet to be established.
Does precision reflect promiscuity?
Efficient end-to-end ligation of complementing fragments of the viral genome suggests that terminal nucleotides of the fragments may encounter each other with a relatively high probability, at least under the conditions when a large RNA pool is transfected into a cell. The potential to form a heteroduplex in which the to-be-ligated nucleotides would lie in close proximity seems not essential. It could be imagined that termini of some molecules are hidden inside complex secondary or tertiary structures but the transfected molecules are perhaps moving one relative to another so efficiently that, as a rule, contacts between arbitrarily chosen nucleotides in separate molecules become feasible during relatively short periods of time, for example, hours. The ligation products are precise recombinants simply because the fragments are designed to achieve such a goal.
Generation of precise recombinants by overlapping fragments of viral RNA is much more surprising. It is shown here that the precise nonreplicative crossovers can occur at different locations and might involve different nucleotides. In principle, the precision may result from three fundamentally different, but not necessarily mutually exclusive, mechanisms.
Unfortunately, a direct RT-PCR assay for recombinant molecules could hardly permit reliable identification of primary recombinants, due to the well known template-switching ability of reverse transcriptases. Thus, the existing data do not permit choosing among the above possibilities. However, any of these possibilities would involve some unknown, or at least underappreciated, properties of RNA molecules.
Unsolved mechanism(s) of nonreplicative RNA recombination
Terminal 3'-phosphate and 5'-OH groups, without activation, cannot serve as an appropriate substrate for known RNA ligases, regardless of their enzymatic or ribozyme nature.
Acceptable combinations are represented by 3'-terminal cyclic 2',3'-phosphate and 5'-terminal phosphate or OH groups (Abelson et al. 1998
; Reid and Lazinski 2000
; Ho and Shuman 2002
; Salgia et al. 2003
), or by 3'-OH and 5'-phosphate groups (Cruz-Reyes et al. 2002
; Simpson et al. 2003
). The conversion of the 3'-terminal nucleotide of the Hrp2 5'-partner into a cyclic 2',3'-phosphate form did not enhance the recombinogenic potential of this RNA fragment. Thus cyclization of the 3'-terminus is not either essential or limiting for the ligation reaction. It is reasonable to suggest that the ligation of fragments of the viral RNA with "unconventional" ends described here takes place intracellularly and involves some enzymes or "factors". Their identification may be facilitated by using cell-free systems for poliovirus recombination (Duggal et al. 1997
; Tang et al. 1997
). Alternatively, though not very likely, the approach used here, due to its ability to detect negligible amounts of the product, may reveal some hidden intrinsic properties of RNA molecules.
Particularly puzzling are recombination events involving overlapping RNA fragments. In fact, three types of covalent joining of RNA pieces were observed in this case: intervention of either the 3'-terminal nucleotide of the 5'-fragment or the 5'-terminal nucleotide of the 3'-fragment into an internal position of their respective counterparts, as well as crossovers between internal positions of overlapping sequences. It is unknown whether each of these reactions is accomplished by a distinct mechanism or whether they exploit some common mechanism(s).
A set of hypothetical mechanisms may require prior cleavage of appropriate phosphodiester bond(s) and generation of a ligatable terminus (or termini). Such cleavages may be introduced by an endonuclease or may result from cryptic ribozyme-like activity (Gmyl et al. 1999
). In both cases, these cleavages are not expected to be completely random but rather may be clustered at some hot spots (Gmyl et al. 1999
). On the other hand, one may envision another set of mechanisms when breakage of a phosphodiester bond is directly coupled to the generation of another such bond (transesterification).
Because all of the 5'-partners used here contained intact 5UTR, some synthesis of viral proteins other than 3Dpol might occur in the transfected cells prior to recombination. However, none of such proteins are known to exhibit RNA-cleaving or RNA-ligating activities. Therefore, their contribution, if any, to nonreplicative RNA recombination can hardly be essential. Moreover, nonreplicative RNA recombination may occur with a comparable efficiency when genomic fragments with negligible, if any, translational template activities have been used (Gmyl et al. 1999
).
Biological relevance of nonreplicative RNA recombination
The potential to shuffle domains of viral RNAs and to assemble viral genomes from RNA segments originating from different sources, including unrelated viruses or host genes, should play a pivotal role in evolution of RNA viruses (Gorbalenya 1992
; Koonin and Dolja 1993
). On the other hand, recombination serves the opposite, genome-stabilizing function by allowing viruses to get rid of adverse mutation inevitably generated at a high rate by the error-prone viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (Agol 2002
). Both of these functions can be accomplished by either replicative or nonreplicative RNA recombination and, as mentioned above, the contribution of each is currently impossible to evaluate. Nevertheless, even if natural nonreplicative RNA recombination is a very rare event, its potential to promote horizontal transfer of genetic material between unrelated or poorly related RNA viruses as well as between host and viral RNA genomes (Monroe and Schlesinger 1983
; Munishkin et al. 1988
; Khatchikian et al. 1989
; Charini et al. 1994
; Avota et al. 1998
; Baroth et al. 2000
; Becher et al. 2001
, 2002
; Nagai et al. 2003
; A.P. Gmyl, unpubl.) should not be overlooked.
It is tempting to suggest that the mechanism(s) responsible for the nonreplicative recombination between viral RNA genomes may well operate with cellular RNA species as well. In this regard, it is appropriate to note that a significant proportion of "chimeric" cellular transcripts representing noncontiguous genetic loci could be detected in the cDNA databases, and some of them could not be readily explained by canonical trans-splicing or chromosomal translocations (Romani et al. 2003
). Although artifacts of different types could be responsible for the occurrence of many such chimeras (Romani et al. 2003
), postreplicative joining of mRNAs or their fragments by mechanisms related to those responsible for the phenomena described here could also be a contributing factor.
Nonreplicative RNA recombination could operate during the RNA world era as well as at all subsequent stages of biological evolution. Moreover, the inherent ability of RNA molecules to recombine may also contribute, in cooperation with reverse transcription, to the evolution of cellular DNA genomes.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To generate the 5'-partners, appropriate fragments of pT7PV1 were amplified using the sense primer B5594 (positions 55865606 of the poliovirus RNA) and one of the antisense primers, 5'-gaccgTACGGCGCTACCTGTTATCACCCCAGGGTTCTTATGAAACGCAGCATATAG6566-3' (5Hrp1), 5'-catcCCGGGATTCTTGTGGAAAGCAGCATAAAGATTCCCGAAGGCCATTCTCATTGC6542-3' (5Hrp2), 5'-gaccgTACGCGGTCTCCG6760-3' (5Sup). The PCR products were digested with BglII, gel-purified, and introduced into the full-length viral genomes using the existing BglII site at position 5602 and an artificial SmaI site created at position 6592 by mutagenic PCR. Additionally, a genome segment between positions 7055 and 7334 was deleted from all of the 5'-partner encoding plasmids using PvuII and ScaI sites.
The primary structures of the entire 3'-partners and of the modified portions of the 5'-partners were checked by sequencing.
Preparation of transcripts and modification of terminal nucleotides
The plasmids linearized with EcoRI (all 3'-partners), SplI (Hrp1 and Sup 5'-partners), or XmaI (Hrp2 5'-partner) were transcribed by T7 RNA polymerase, purified and, when appropriate, subjected to terminal modifications: oxidation/ß-elimination or pNp ligation for the preparation of 5'-partners (note that these forms were therefore one nucleotide shorter or one nucleotide longer than the original transcripts, respectively) and phosphatase treatment for the preparation of NP 5'-partners and O 3'-partners, as described (Gmyl et al. 1999
). To convert the 3'-phosphate of Hrp2 5'-partners to the 2',3'-cyclic phosphate (cP) form, 5 µg of RNA was incubated in a 40-µL mixture containing 20 mM HEPES-KOH pH 7.6, 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM ATP, 60 U of RNasin (Promega), and 1 µg of the recombinant E. coli RNA 3'-terminal phosphate cyclase for 15 min at 25°C. The cyclase was overexpressed as His-tagged protein and purified as described (Genschik et al. 1998
). To check the efficiency of cyclization, the Hrp2 5'-partners with labeled 3'-phosphate were prepared. To this end, 1 nM of the [32P]C3'p or [32P]A3'p was added to the ligation mixture during the preparation of the Hrp2 5'-partner from the original transcript. The labeled RNA, 0.5 µg, was digested with nuclease P1, and the digestion products were subjected to thin layer chromatography on PEI cellulose plate in saturated (NH4)2SO4/3M Na acetate/isopropanol (80:6:2) or 1 N acetic acid/3 M LiCl (9:1) for the cytidylic and adenylic nucleotides, respectively. Appropriate spots were cut from the plate, and their radioactivity was counted. The conversion of 3'-phosphate into cyclic form was found to be >90%. To prepare a set of Sup1 3'-partners with 5'-OH (O form), 5'-monophosphate (P), and 5'-diphosphate (2P) groups, the T7 RNA polymerase transcription was carried out in mixtures containing 2 mM each of ATP, CTP, UTP, and 0.5 mM GTP, and 5 mM of guanosine, GMP, and GDP, respectively.
Transfection
The DEAE-dextran mediated transfection of Vero cells was carried out as described (Gmyl et al. 1999
) using a mixture of the 5'- and 3'-fragments (1 µg of each). Prior to transfection, the fragments were mixed in 20 µL of 100 mM NaCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.8 and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. When indicated, 1 µL of RQ1 RNase-free DNase (1 unit, Promega) or 1 µL RNase A (20 mg/mL, Sigma) was added to the mixture.
Sequencing
The material from a plaque was suspended in 1 mL of Earles saline and subjected to RT-PCR using primers 5'-(T)15CTCC-3' (antisense) and one corresponding to positions 55865606 (sense). The gel-purified DNA product was sequenced with a Promega fmol Sequencing Kit. Direct sequencing of RNA isolated from the purified virus was done as described (Gmyl et al. 1999
).
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received June 19, 2003; accepted July 15, 2003.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abelson, J., Trotta, C.R., and Li, H. 1998. tRNA splicing. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 1268512688.
Agol, V.I. 1997. Recombination and other genomic rearrangements in picornaviruses. Semin. Virol. 8: 19.
Agol, V.I. 2002. Picornavirus genetics: An overview. In The molecular biology of picornaviruses (eds. B.L. Semler and E. Wimmer), pp. 269284. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
Arnold, J.J. and Cameron, C.E. 1999. Poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (3Dpol) is sufficient for template switching in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 27062716.
Avota, E., Berzins, V., Grens, E., Vishnevsky, Y., Luce, R., and Biebricher, C. 1998. The natural 6 S RNA found in Qß-infected cells is derived from host and phage RNA. J. Mol. Biol. 276: 717.[CrossRef][Medline]
Baroth, M., Orlich, M., Thiel, H.J., and Becher, P. 2000. Insertion of cellular NEDD8 coding sequences in a pestivirus. Virology 278: 456466.[CrossRef][Medline]
Becher, P., Orlich, M., and Thiel, H.J. 2001. RNA recombination between persisting pestivirus and a vaccine strain: Generation of cytopathogenic virus and induction of lethal disease. J. Virol. 75: 62566264.
Becher, P., Thiel, H.J., Collins, M., Brownlie, J., and Orlich, M. 2002. Cellular sequences in pestivirus genomes encoding
-aminobutyric acid (A) receptor-associated protein and Golgi-associated ATPase enhancer of 16 kD. J. Virol. 76: 1306913076.
Cameron, C.E., Gohara, D.W., and Arnold, J.J. 2002. Poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (3Dpol): Structure, function, and mechanism. In The molecular biology of picornaviruses (eds. B.L. Semler and E. Wimmer), pp. 255267. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
Charini, W.A., Todd, S., Gutman, G.A., and Semler, B.L. 1994. Transduction of a human RNA sequence by poliovirus. J. Virol. 68: 65476552.
Chetverin, A.B. 1999. The puzzle of RNA recombination. FEBS Lett. 460: 15.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chetverin, A.B., Chetverina, H.V., Demidenko, A.A., and Ugarov, V.I. 1997. Nonhomologous RNA recombination in a cell-free system: Evidence for a transesterification mechanism guided by secondary structure. Cell 88: 503513.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chetverina, H.V., Demidenko, A.A., Ugarov, V.I., and Chetverin, A.B. 1999. Spontaneous rearrangements in RNA sequences. FEBS Lett. 450: 8994.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cooper, P.D. 1977. Genetics of picornaviruses. Comp. Virol. 9: 133207.
Cruz-Reyes, J., Zhelonkina, A.G., Huang, C.E., and Sollner-Webb, B. 2002. Distinct functions of two RNA ligases in active Trypanosoma brucei RNA editing complexes. Mol. Cell Biol. 22: 46524660.
Diener, T.O. 2001. The viroid: Biological oddity or evolutionary fossil? Adv. Virus Res. 57: 137184.[Medline]
Doudna, J.A. and Cech, T.R. 2002. The chemical repertoire of natural ribozymes. Nature 418: 222228.[CrossRef][Medline]
Duggal, R., Cuconati, A., Gromeier, M., and Wimmer, E. 1997. Genetic recombination of poliovirus in a cell-free system. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 94: 1378613791.
Dzianott, A., Rauffer-Bruyere, N., and Bujarski, J.J. 2001. Studies on functional interaction between brome mosaic virus replicase proteins during RNA recombination, using combined mutants in vivo and in vitro. Virology 289: 137149.[CrossRef][Medline]
Figlerowicz, M. 2000. Role of RNA structure in nonhomologous recombination between genomic molecules of brome mosaic virus. Nucleic Acids Res. 28: 17141723.
Filipowicz, W., Konarska, M., Gross, H.J., and Shatkin, A.J. 1983. RNA 3'-terminal phosphate cyclase activity and RNA ligation in HeLa cell extract. Nucleic Acids Res. 11: 14051418.
Genschik, P., Billy, E., Swianiewicz, M., and Filipowicz, W. 1997. The human RNA 3'-terminal phosphate cyclase is a member of a new family of proteins conserved in Eucarya, Bacteria and Archaea. EMBO J. 16: 29552967.[CrossRef][Medline]
Genschik, P., Drabikowski, K., and Filipowicz, W. 1998. Characterization of the Escherichia coli RNA 3'-terminal phosphate cyclase and its
54-regulated operon, J. Biol. Chem. 273: 2551625526.
Gmyl, A.P., Belousov, E.V., Maslova, S.V., Khitrina, E.V., and Agol, V.I. 1999. Nonreplicative RNA recombination in poliovirus. J. Virol. 73: 89588965.
Gonzalez, T.N., Sidrauski, C., Dorfler, S., and Walter, P. 1999. Mechanism of nonspliceosomal mRNA splicing in the unfolded protein response pathway. EMBO J. 18: 31193132.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gorbalenya, A.E. 1992. Host-related sequences in RNA viral genomes. Semin. Virol. 3: 359371.
Hansen, J.L., Long, A.M., and Schultz, S.C. 1997. Structure of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of poliovirus. Structure 5: 11091122.[Medline]
Ho, C.K. and Shuman, S. 2002. Bacteriophage T4 RNA ligase 2 (gp24.1) exemplifies a family of RNA ligases found in all phylogenetic domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99: 1270912714.
Ikegami, M. and Fraenkel-Conrat, H. 1979. Characterization of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of tobacco leaves. J. Biol. Chem. 254: 149154.
Izban, M.G., Parsons, M.A., and Sinden, R.R. 1998. Template end-to-end transposition by RNA polymerase II. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 2700927016.
Jarvis, T.C. and Kirkegaard, K. 1991. The polymerase in its labyrinth: Mechanisms and implications of RNA recombination. Trends Genet. 7: 186191.[Medline]
Kandel, E.S. and Nudler, E. 2002. Template switching by RNA polymerase II in vivo. Evidence and implications from a retroviral system. Mol. Cell 10: 14951502.[Medline]
Khatchikian, D., Orlich, M., and Rott, R. 1989. Increased viral pathogenicity after insertion of a 28S ribosomal RNA sequence into the haemagglutinin gene of an influenza virus. Nature 340: 156157.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kim, M.-J. and Kao, C. 2001. Factors regulating template switch in vitro by viral RNA-dependent RNA poloymerases: Implications for RNARNA recombination. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 98: 49724977.
Kirkegaard, K. and Baltimore, D. 1986. The mechanism of RNA recombination in poliovirus. Cell 47: 433443.[CrossRef][Medline]
Koonin, E.V. and Dolja, V.V. 1993. Evolution and taxonomy of positive-strand RNA viruses: Implications of comparative analysis of amino acid sequences. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 28: 375430.[Medline]
Kuge, S., Saito, I., and Nomoto, A. 1986. Primary structure of poliovirus defective-interfering particle genomes and possible generation mechanisms of the particles. J. Mol. Biol. 192: 473487.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lai, M.M.C. 1992. RNA recombination in animal and plant viruses. Microbiol. Rev. 56: 6179.
Lai, M.M.C and Holmes, K.V. 2001. Coronaviridae: The viruses and their replication. In Fields virology, 4th ed. (eds. D.M. Knipe and P.M. Howley), pp. 11631185. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
Lamb, R.A. and Krug, R.M. 2001. Orthomyxoviridae: The viruses and their replication. In Fields virology, 4th ed. (eds. D.M. Knipe and P.M. Howley), pp. 14871531. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
Ledinko, N. 1963. Genetic recombination with poliovirus type 1. Studies of crosses between a normal horse serum-resistant mutant and several guanidine-resistant mutants of the same strain. Virology 20: 107119.[CrossRef][Medline]
Milligan, J.F., Groebe, D.R., Witherell, G.W., and Uhlenbeck, O.C. 1987. Oligoribonucleotide synthesis using T7 RNA polymerase and synthetic DNA templates. Nucleic Acids Res. 15: 87838798.
Modahl, L.E., Macnaughton, T.B., Zhu, N., Johnson, D.L., and Lai, M.M.C. 2000. RNA-dependent replication and transcription of hepatitis
virus RNA involve distinct cellular RNA polymerases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 60306039.
Monroe, S.S. and Schlesinger, S. 1983. RNAs from two independently isolated defective interfering particles of Sindbis virus contain a cellular tRNA sequence at their 5' ends. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 80: 32793283.
Munishkin, A.V., Voronin, L.A., and Chetverin, A.B. 1988. An in vivo recombinant RNA capable of autocatalytic synthesis by Q ßreplicase. Nature 333: 473475.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nagai, M., Sakoda, Y., Mori, M., Hayashi, M., Kida, H., and Akashi, H. 2003. Insertion of cellular sequence and RNA recombination in the structural protein coding region of cytopathogenic bovine viral diarrhoea virus. J. Gen. Virol. 84: 447452.
Nagy, P.D. and Bujarski, J.J. 1993. Targeting the site of RNARNA recombination in brome mosaic virus with antisense sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 90: 63906394.
Nagy, P.D. and Simon, A.E. 1997. New insights into the mechanisms of RNA recombination. Virology 235: 19.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nagy, P.D., Pogany, J., and Simon, A.E. 1999. RNA elements required for RNA recombination function as replication enhancers in vitro and in vivo in a plus-strand RNA virus. EMBO J. 18: 56535665.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nishikura, K. 2001. A short primer on RNAi: RNA-directed RNA polymerase acts as a key catalyst. Cell 107: 415418.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nudler, E., Avetissova, E., Markovtsov, V., and Goldfarb, A. 1996. Transcription processivity: Protein-DNA interactions holding together the elongation complex. Science 273: 211217.[Abstract]
Pilipenko, E.V., Gmyl, A.P., Maslova, S.V., Svitkin, Y.V., Sinyakov, A.N., and Agol, V.I. 1992. A prokaryotic-like cis-element in the cap-independent internal initiation of translation on picornavirus RNA. Cell 68: 119131.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pilipenko, E.V., Gmyl, A.P., and Agol, V.I. 1995. A model for rearrangements in RNA genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 23: 18701875.
Pleiss, J.A., Derrick, M.L., and Uhlenbeck, O.C. 1998. T7 RNA polymerase produces 5' end heterogeneity during in vitro transcription from certain templates. RNA 4: 13131317.[Abstract]
Reed, R. 2000. Mechanisms of fidelity in pre-mRNA splicing. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12: 340345.[CrossRef][Medline]
Reid, C.E. and Lazinski, D.W. 2000. A host-specific function is required for ligation of a wide variety of ribozyme-processed RNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 424429.
Romani, A., Guerra, E., Trerotola, M., and Alberti, S. 2003. Detection and analysis of spliced chimeric mRNAs in sequence databanks. Nucleic Acids Res. 31: e17.
Romanova, L.I., Blinov, V.M., Tolskaya, E.A., Viktorova, E.G., Kolesnikova, M.S., Guseva, E.A., and Agol, V.I. 1986. The primary structure of crossover regions of intertypic poliovirus recombinants: A model of recombination between RNA genomes. Virology 155: 202213.[CrossRef][Medline]
Salgia, S.R., Singh, S.K., Gurha, P., and Gupta, R. 2003. Two reactions of Haloferax volcanii RNA splicing enzymes: Joining of exons and circularization of introns. RNA 9: 319330.
Schiebel, W., Haas, B., Marinkovic, S., Klanner, A., and Sänger, H.L. 1993. RNA-directed RNA polymerase from tomato leaves. II. Catalytic in vitro properties. J. Biol. Chem. 268: 1185811867.
Schiebel, W., Pélissier, T., Riedel, L., Thalmeir, S., Schiebel, R., Kempe, D., Lottspeich, F., Sänger, H.L., and Wassenegger, M. 1998. Isolation of an RNA-directed RNA polymerase-specific cDNA clone from tomato. Plant Cell 10: 20872102.
Simpson, L., Sbicego, S., and Aphasizhev, R. 2003. Uridine insertion/deletion RNA editing in trypanosome mitochondria: A complex business. RNA 9: 265276.
Singh, R. 2002. RNA-protein interactions that regulate pre-mRNA splicing. Gene Expr. 10: 7992.[Medline]
Tang, R.S., Barton, D.J., Flanegan, J.B., and Kirkegaard, K. 1997. Poliovirus RNA recombination in cell-free extracts. RNA 3: 624633.[Abstract]
Tolskaya, E.A., Romanova, L.I., Blinov, V.M., Viktorova, E.G., Sinyakov, A.N., Kolesnikova, M.S., and Agol, V.I. 1987. Studies on the recombination between RNA genomes of poliovirus: The primary structure and nonrandom distribution of crossover regions in the gen