RNA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


RNA (2008), 14:657-665. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Copyright © 2008 RNA Society.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pattanayak, V.
Right arrow Articles by Gewirtz, A. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pattanayak, V.
Right arrow Articles by Gewirtz, A. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

REPORT

Observed versus predicted structure of fluorescent self-quenching reporter molecules (SQRM): Caveats with respect to the use of "stem–loop" oligonucleotides as probes for mRNA folding

Vikram Pattanayak1,3, Lida K. Gifford2,3, Ponzy Lu2, and Alan M. Gewirtz1

1 Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
2 Department of Chemistry, School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA

We developed self-quenching reporter molecules (SQRMs), oligodeoxynucleotides with fluorophore and quencher moieties at the 5' and 3' ends respectively, to probe mRNAs for single-stranded, hybridization accessible sequences. SQRMs and their homologous antecedents, Molecular Beacons (MB), are designed with the assumption that they adopt a stem–loop structure thought critical for regulating their reporter function. Recently, we observed that stem–loop structures are not required for SQRM function, and on this basis proposed that these reporter molecules be classified according to whether they were stemmed (Type I) or not (Type II). This finding further stimulated us to investigate whether Type I SQRMs, and by extension MBs, actually adopt a stem–loop configuration under physiologic conditions. Accordingly, we synthesized Type I and Type II SQRMs and studied the thermodynamic characteristics of each by fluorescence melting analysis. The results of these studies suggested that the majority of stem–loop Type I SQRMs are unstructured at 37°C, while some of the stemless Type II SQRMs are, surprisingly, structured. These results were not predicted by the mfold computer program. Type I and II SQRMs were then employed to "map" the mRNA secondary structure of a gene encoding a tyrosine kinase receptor, c-kit. Neither experimentally determined melting temperatures nor mfold-"predicted" thermodynamic parameters were useful in predicting the fluorescence signal-to-noise ratios obtained for SQRMs incubated with c-kit mRNA. We conclude that stem–loop reporter molecules are in fact unlikely to adopt their presumed structures at 37°C, and this design consideration may be dispensed when their use is contemplated under physiologic conditions.

Keywords: fluorescent probes; oligodeoxynucleotides; structure; RNA silencing


Received October 26, 2007 ; accepted December 27, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the RNA Society.