RNA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 26, 2008, 10.1261/rna.883908
RNA (2008), 14:616-629. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Copyright © 2008 RNA Society.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Research Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
rna.883908v1
rna.883908v2
14/4/616    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hiller, M.
Right arrow Articles by Platzer, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hiller, M.
Right arrow Articles by Platzer, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

BIOINFORMATICS

Assessing the fraction of short-distance tandem splice sites under purifying selection

Michael Hiller1, Karol Szafranski2, Rileen Sinha2, Klaus Huse2, Swetlana Nikolajewa3, Philip Rosenstiel4, Stefan Schreiber4, Rolf Backofen1, and Matthias Platzer2

1 Bioinformatics Group, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
2 Genome Analysis, Leibniz Institute for Age Research, Fritz Lipmann Institute, 07745 Jena, Germany
3 Department of Bioinformatics, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany
4 Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany

Many alternative splice events result in subtle mRNA changes, and most of them occur at short-distance tandem donor and acceptor sites. The splicing mechanism of such tandem sites likely involves the stochastic selection of either splice site. While tandem splice events are frequent, it is unknown how many are functionally important. Here, we use phylogenetic conservation to address this question, focusing on tandems with a distance of 3–9 nucleotides. We show that previous contradicting results on whether alternative or constitutive tandem motifs are more conserved between species can be explained by a statistical paradox (Simpson's paradox). Applying methods that take biases into account, we found higher conservation of alternative tandems in mouse, dog, and even chicken, zebrafish, and Fugu genomes. We estimated a lower bound for the number of alternative sites that are under purifying (negative) selection. While the absolute number of conserved tandem motifs decreases with the evolutionary distance, the fraction under selection increases. Interestingly, a number of frameshifting tandems are under selection, suggesting a role in regulating mRNA and protein levels via nonsense-mediated decay (NMD). An analysis of the intronic flanks shows that purifying selection also acts on the intronic sequence. We propose that stochastic splice site selection can be an advantageous mechanism that allows constant splice variant ratios in situations where a deviation in this ratio is deleterious.

Keywords: purifying selection; subtle alternative splicing; tandem splice site; comparative genome analysis; Simpson's paradox


Received October 19, 2007 ; accepted January 3, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the RNA Society.