|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REVIEW |
Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, IRCM, Département de Microbiologie et Immunologie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, H2W 1R7, Canada
Alternative splicing is widely believed to have a major impact on almost all biological processes since it increases proteome complexity and thereby controls protein function. Recently, gene targeting in mice has been used to create in vivo models to study the regulation and consequences of alternative splicing. The evidence accumulated so far argues for a nonredundant, highly specific role of individual splicing factors in mammalian development, and furthermore, demonstrates the importance of distinct protein isoforms in vivo. In this review, we will compare phenotypes of mouse models for alternative splicing to crystallize common themes and to put them into perspective with the available in vitro data.
Keywords: alternative splicing; mouse models
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. C. Coutinho-Mansfield, Y. Xue, Y. Zhang, and X.-D. Fu PTB/nPTB switch: a post-transcriptional mechanism for programming neuronal differentiation Genes & Dev., July 1, 2007; 21(13): 1573 - 1577. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |